I didn't mean to spark a debate, and I now realize that this topic elicits very emotional reactions. So I'm sorry if my post hurt your feelings.
However IMHO the compilation of the Bible (as a collection of books/texts) in the year 325 and the decision regarding which texts were included and which were excluded were determined not only by religious factors but also by political ones (as I try to point out in the attached note).
If you claim that the Gospels and texts not included in the Bible originate from Satan, then of course there is nothing more I can point to. That puts an end to any discussion. I can only note that this follows the line of reasoning that has concealed and banned valuable texts and insights for millennia.
Incidentally, this would also render valuable religious insights—such as those of indigenous peoples—of little value.
Once again: I hold the teachings of Jesus in the highest regard, and in that regard, I am sorry if I have hurt your feelings.
