Is bip 110 decreasing the power of decentralization 😲🙁😲 , goal of bip 110 is decreasing csam? (But you can't have 0% csam)
Bip 110 will make btc more fragile (less decentralized than before) a few can maybe fuck it up for everyone else...😶
When it can’t prevent CSAM, I'm against it. What I understand bip 110 is not 0% CSAM, and this will make BTC more fragile.
I personally don't want a few -> that can make it worse long term for everyone else, and when csam can't be 0%, than bip 110 will also have CSAM: "if CSAM still exist with bip 110🔍, the reason for changing BTC is insufficient😵💫🤔 = poorly substantiated👀 and is not worth future risks😬😓."
Conclusion:
when bip 110 can't prevent CSAM (I hate CSAM), the reason to change BTC is insufficient, "it increases the risks for BTC as a whole".
Bob / Bob Social,
npub1rq…dsmxw
2026-04-05 14:05:37 UTC
in reply to nevent1q…9dul
Author Public Key
npub1rqc3jk6gafehx93rhjweh2wcwj5dd9y8na0h6hu2k6qjpkh7d3xqedsmxwSeen on
wss://relay.mostr.pubPublished at
2026-04-05 14:05:37 UTCEvent JSON
{
"id": "aea6c6af78e755b46d4d31df7fa23c9d05abfb7eae9bcd77a17d31d152f27bfe",
"pubkey": "1831195b48ea73731623bc9d9ba9d874a8d694879f5f7d5f8ab68120dafe6c4c",
"created_at": 1775397937,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"1831195b48ea73731623bc9d9ba9d874a8d694879f5f7d5f8ab68120dafe6c4c",
"",
"mention"
],
[
"p",
"846307688a09ec112967eb0544e78a9e88c48f50712c39ed491ff2b6fa019ae8",
"",
"mention"
],
[
"p",
"c13d020bbca9a27d651099809af9d4b61ffd46e844f20e477c17cd2a0304d8a3"
],
[
"p",
"846307688a09ec112967eb0544e78a9e88c48f50712c39ed491ff2b6fa019ae8",
"wss://relay.primal.net"
],
[
"e",
"a761557fd54dfac0ce3d381af9167146129574603605b748ce82ea5f5f1387cb",
"",
"reply",
"c13d020bbca9a27d651099809af9d4b61ffd46e844f20e477c17cd2a0304d8a3"
],
[
"e",
"49597690344363cbe93ee742a3e246fcfb49f792f7c62df37ba179b38e022498",
"wss://relay.primal.net",
"root",
"846307688a09ec112967eb0544e78a9e88c48f50712c39ed491ff2b6fa019ae8"
],
[
"client",
"Primal Android"
]
],
"content": "Is bip 110 decreasing the power of decentralization 😲🙁😲 , goal of bip 110 is decreasing csam? (But you can't have 0% csam) \n\nBip 110 will make btc more fragile (less decentralized than before) a few can maybe fuck it up for everyone else...😶\n\nWhen it can’t prevent CSAM, I'm against it. What I understand bip 110 is not 0% CSAM, and this will make BTC more fragile. \n\nI personally don't want a few -\u003e that can make it worse long term for everyone else, and when csam can't be 0%, than bip 110 will also have CSAM: \"if CSAM still exist with bip 110🔍, the reason for changing BTC is insufficient😵💫🤔 = poorly substantiated👀 and is not worth future risks😬😓.\"\n\nConclusion: \nwhen bip 110 can't prevent CSAM (I hate CSAM), the reason to change BTC is insufficient, \"it increases the risks for BTC as a whole\". \n \n\n",
"sig": "50d2faf61d5cde5a79a38e99a60953283e659d7c3a8c47241a82767ca6b0d6bdd4e741c764f363932588aa471472644cc0100088fa468017a09d28bea8db9b04"
}