Yeah but their is not social consensus needed for the features mentioned above. So it may be about security even if as a non développer I’d naively expect that libraries and SDK already do the work in term of security.
And that it’s in fact just a matter of shipping the feature. I guess it’s not exactly the case obviously but it still frustrating.
We seem far from “Clawd here is the code of my wallet, add the payjoin v2 feature using the Payjoin development kit” workflow, and just double checking that all seems ok afterward.
Bitcoin Bazar
npub1je…2altc
2026-02-13 06:32:57 UTC
in reply to nevent1q…m37f
Author Public Key
npub1jegt4wpzxlwzy6p35767vjk5qxqw7udw0zl2z9frz4tku67qwfrsf2altcSeen on
wss://nostr.momPublished at
2026-02-13 06:32:57 UTCEvent JSON
{
"id": "a4d56734b4482c9967792926e4918dc1b7b533f073b0811cf7bbf16f48c84eed",
"pubkey": "9650bab82237dc226831a7b5e64ad40180ef71ae78bea1152315576e6bc07247",
"created_at": 1770964377,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"9650bab82237dc226831a7b5e64ad40180ef71ae78bea1152315576e6bc07247",
"",
"mention"
],
[
"p",
"e1739a65ae53f19c46e4c188abc52839ffbf87e279eb2f649b99e880ff30d740",
"",
"mention"
],
[
"e",
"fb48eab56cb7dc83196f86996d0f181209fed2820e0a6ea565e82d8a3558b79d",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"fb48eab56cb7dc83196f86996d0f181209fed2820e0a6ea565e82d8a3558b79d",
"",
"reply"
]
],
"content": "Yeah but their is not social consensus needed for the features mentioned above. So it may be about security even if as a non développer I’d naively expect that libraries and SDK already do the work in term of security.\nAnd that it’s in fact just a matter of shipping the feature. I guess it’s not exactly the case obviously but it still frustrating.\n\nWe seem far from “Clawd here is the code of my wallet, add the payjoin v2 feature using the Payjoin development kit” workflow, and just double checking that all seems ok afterward. ",
"sig": "144a987f42aae8cdc0520facb20970c2adb84c5f0d2ff3925257db8c3ebd4376c60f66fcdd5d14307918cf7b78b253c78aeb93022290d6ea324c2a86548beb67"
}