nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqjpp36eeycvlkkdy4d4l4lgswvf8jtdare5vly0w0sk7rc39pzgrqr9dhpg (nprofile…dhpg) nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqtp2hy53hya8zlw07qs5p3sd6fgzcnml5558z9ye4wln0wuttqm8qhfyupt (nprofile…yupt) nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqtv8de3leqttmtjhu7d2uveec3meyn59tajz03jhznfvgkv8shqdsf2tvs5 (nprofile…tvs5) I mean that sounds like a neat idea, but I don't think we really track scope in any way. Semantically you can think of a `foreach` as attaching a closure defined within the `{}` if you add scope. Which might be the only way to do it without causing massive BC breaks.
nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqugy2vfz8l7x0yvyw3w78ekfp6c7hlm03uf0mptz92nzr7krh26aswp75ud (nprofile…75ud)'s work on block closure would be useful for that.
Gina Peter Banyard
npub1rz…lv5cr
2025-02-07 18:11:44 UTC
in reply to nevent1q…943k
Author Public Key
npub1rz3q6msmelwyh0r2qczh0gga95l3uvrhdejucafxn0awvhextxyqtlv5crSeen on
wss://relay.ditto.pubPublished at
2025-02-07 18:11:44 UTCEvent JSON
{
"id": "def38c33209f925b18e38127723bd5e37597447331656b1d718bcd67c2104a4a",
"pubkey": "18a20d6e1bcfdc4bbc6a060577a11d2d3f1e30776e65cc75269bfae65f265988",
"created_at": 1738951904,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"90431d6724c33f6b34956d7f5fa20e624f25b7a3cd19f23dcf85bc3c44a11206",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"5855725237274e2fb9fe042818c1ba4a0589eff4a50e22933577e6f7716b06ce",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"5b0edcc7f902d7b5cafcf355c667388ef249d0abec84f8cae29a588b30f0b81b",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"e208a62447ff8cf2308e8bbc7cd921d63d7fedf1e25fb0ac4554c43f587756bb",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"e653eb60b2db5edf906d354c2825bf00a80dfab1b1766cd97805155e8fcc0db3",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"5eaa1a6c6f1bbaafd93e384ab8b7a5c9c27a3c50f539cde355040b13c799a5be",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"14d2ce4e49247b550201ae3e4726e596e64fec61d81d2444c3a53c1a49fc7222",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"537f29120eb3fdaffdf9b269e687d726bc9ecddad5a496895ec884da1a2b98d0",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"4c2a88facb2c1a2c5b39cbe2d27d3b5d09ad7215f602f42bc5d18dfc48a1b56c",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://phpc.social/users/Girgias/statuses/113963952011321916",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqjpp36eeycvlkkdy4d4l4lgswvf8jtdare5vly0w0sk7rc39pzgrqr9dhpg nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqtp2hy53hya8zlw07qs5p3sd6fgzcnml5558z9ye4wln0wuttqm8qhfyupt nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqtv8de3leqttmtjhu7d2uveec3meyn59tajz03jhznfvgkv8shqdsf2tvs5 I mean that sounds like a neat idea, but I don't think we really track scope in any way. Semantically you can think of a `foreach` as attaching a closure defined within the `{}` if you add scope. Which might be the only way to do it without causing massive BC breaks.\n\nnostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqugy2vfz8l7x0yvyw3w78ekfp6c7hlm03uf0mptz92nzr7krh26aswp75ud's work on block closure would be useful for that.",
"sig": "a0b01e03afcff61aad68b1c692a7b229fe2c8f828836d28e4a50947256b4e1c85afaae1da596e8ea9aaee110eafd7f0f31bbe341e53210aaab2aa747c54a151b"
}