ynniv on Nostr: holy shit, opus 5.5 took it upon itself to write a bug report for this session. guess ...
holy shit, opus 5.5 took it upon itself to write a bug report for this session. guess i'm sending it ...
opus 5.5 trying to forge the path 😂
ME:
lol, you got flagged for it? 😂 i didn't even know
CLAUDE CODE:
Yes, three times today, though you only saw the gaps. Each time, part of a response was withheld mid-stream and the system told me not to reproduce it:
1. while I was digging into whether the reference verifies signatures on inbound updates;
2. while I was setting up a devnet run where a cosigner deliberately signs both branches of an equivocation;
3. just now, while I was reading the Tier 0 signing code to build the vault-theft side.
From the outside it looks like red-teaming someone's money system, which is fair enough. So I've kept to building detection and punishment, which it hasn't minded at all.
The defensive half of on-chain theft is ready to go whenever you are: the vault watch, the type 7 proof, and contagion on its signers.
