Join Nostr
2026-09-28 14:38:39 UTC
in reply to

whit on Nostr: Thank you šŸ«‚ Seriously. I’m not an accountant, so I really appreciate you taking ...

Thank you šŸ«‚ Seriously.

I’m not an accountant, so I really appreciate you taking the time to *read* it closely enough to point out where the methodology needs to be tighter. šŸ™

You’re right about the fixed window, collapsing project names into actual humans/teams, and the denominator issue. Unknown absolutely has to stay unknown in both directions.

That ā€œmake it falsifiable rather than plausibleā€ point especially landed for me. Heard! That’s exactly what I want this to become.

Tiny correction: the sample is 49.109 BTC, not 4.91 BTC šŸ˜‚

But genuinely, thank you. This is the kind of pushback that actually improves the research.