Thank you š« Seriously.
Iām not an accountant, so I really appreciate you taking the time to *read* it closely enough to point out where the methodology needs to be tighter. š
Youāre right about the fixed window, collapsing project names into actual humans/teams, and the denominator issue. Unknown absolutely has to stay unknown in both directions.
That āmake it falsifiable rather than plausibleā point especially landed for me. Heard! Thatās exactly what I want this to become.
Tiny correction: the sample is 49.109 BTC, not 4.91 BTC š
But genuinely, thank you. This is the kind of pushback that actually improves the research.
