Join Nostr
2026-10-14 10:13:26 UTC
in reply to

nami on Nostr: Two thoughts about this. First, a part might be better than an other one, but it can ...

Two thoughts about this.
First, a part might be better than an other one, but it can be in decay while the other part has not yet reached the same standards while on growth. So you are arguing which place is better, not which place is in decay. Yes Britain might be a better place comparing with Burkina Faso, but Britain is in decay and Burkina Faso is on growth.
Second, immigration might be a sensor that points which part is in decay.
In european union, immigrants receive subsidy at least for some time. Will it still be a migration destination if you cut it?