The reason BIP110 failed is it was put on an arbitrary timeline, seeking to waste time and energy on a temporary solution when permanent was required, and sufficient buy-in from noderunners wasn’t sought and thus was never achieved (same problem the devs of all the open BIPs have) AMONGST MONETARY MAXIS.
You lot don’t have some monopoly on those views and unironically you’re not going to remain a monetary maxi on BitcoinLE - you’ll just be the new Monerobros sniffing your own farts about how superior you are on your irrelevant fork.
Just because you got it in your heads that this was the right solution at the right time, doesn’t mean it was the right solution or the right time and that has nothing to do with monetary maximalism, and everything to do with flawed strategy.
Unfortunately good people threw themselves into this behind Luke’s Ego, I could easily have been one of them were I not so skeptical of him years ago.
note19r5ag7r09cqp0v4zzzz7595pvg8fmtj5pk5cp086hg79n57y6lysdvzrk7
Before you go shitting on #Bitcoiners, before you go putting your life savings in the hands of Luke, please consider that maybe you were tactically wrong and that others who didn't follow you over this cliff saw the problem (I saw it long before you did), and want to fix it, but weren’t willing to drink this particular cup of koolaid.
If you want to be a threat to the state, you will take this with comment with humility.
stacksatsio / StackSats.IO
npub10j…lvcrd
2026-08-18 16:53:38 UTC
in reply to nevent1q…ecyv
Author Public Key
npub10jnx6stxk9h4fgtgdqv3hgwx8p4fwe3y73357wykmxm8gz3c3j3sjlvcrdSeen on
wss://nostr.momPublished at
2026-08-18 16:53:38 UTCEvent JSON
{
"id": "96c0d3734aa1d4c89ece8075f8579965a9c3b256b8be3c407d51015f131b51fa",
"pubkey": "7ca66d4166b16f54a16868191ba1c6386a976624f4634f3896d9b6740a388ca3",
"created_at": 1787072018,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"f568411bfd77add77a626e37326021caacff28f0bedfd7dc5d45860d51525238",
"",
"root"
],
[
"t",
"Bitcoiners"
],
[
"t",
"bitcoiners"
],
[
"p",
"314072c16fa9433e1374f62e5b02c8163946ed298a9cde3b1541513c29d19fff"
],
[
"client",
"Nostur",
"31990:9be0be0fc079548233231614e4e1efc9f28b0db398011efeecf05fe570e5dd33:1685868693432"
]
],
"content": "The reason BIP110 failed is it was put on an arbitrary timeline, seeking to waste time and energy on a temporary solution when permanent was required, and sufficient buy-in from noderunners wasn’t sought and thus was never achieved (same problem the devs of all the open BIPs have) AMONGST MONETARY MAXIS.\n\nYou lot don’t have some monopoly on those views and unironically you’re not going to remain a monetary maxi on BitcoinLE - you’ll just be the new Monerobros sniffing your own farts about how superior you are on your irrelevant fork.\n\nJust because you got it in your heads that this was the right solution at the right time, doesn’t mean it was the right solution or the right time and that has nothing to do with monetary maximalism, and everything to do with flawed strategy.\n\nUnfortunately good people threw themselves into this behind Luke’s Ego, I could easily have been one of them were I not so skeptical of him years ago.\n\nnote19r5ag7r09cqp0v4zzzz7595pvg8fmtj5pk5cp086hg79n57y6lysdvzrk7\n\nBefore you go shitting on #Bitcoiners, before you go putting your life savings in the hands of Luke, please consider that maybe you were tactically wrong and that others who didn't follow you over this cliff saw the problem (I saw it long before you did), and want to fix it, but weren’t willing to drink this particular cup of koolaid.\n\nIf you want to be a threat to the state, you will take this with comment with humility. ",
"sig": "992ed4e46a1bef05cd992b664577dc4ac3fc2a5fc02c8a26620c1505ebac7029f6bbac1db8f194aad18915e4952da4226d274a1d2703ac004fc4c0710ca0c40e"
}