Nostr notes by StackSatsRaiseFamily

Show of hands. Who still thinks LN is Bitcoin? Didn’t age well. ...

2026-09-16T23:35:10Z

Show of hands. Who still thinks LN is Bitcoin? Didn’t age well.

quoting
nevent1q…p633
Get the fuck out of here with lightning sats are not bitcoin…they represent bitcoin on a 2nd layer and can be swapped for on chain bitcoin. Only a fucking idiot would suggest trying to send sats from lightning to an onchain address

You are a bad actor and a scammer. I will call you whatever names I want

Yeah, good. Quote the guy who hated democracy. Make my point a ...

2026-07-23T18:13:34Z

In reply to nevent1q…wev8
_________________________

Yeah, good. Quote the guy who hated democracy. Make my point a little better and move to another country if you hate it in America so much.

I’m not pro-war. Keep up or at the least quit being ...

2026-07-23T15:31:42Z

In reply to nevent1q…cadc
_________________________

I’m not pro-war. Keep up or at the least quit being intellectually dishonest. Enjoy your freedoms and pretend that nothing evil ever comes for you.

"We don't want war. But if you want war with the United ...

2026-07-23T15:29:44Z

In reply to nevent1q…gazg
_________________________

"We don't want war. But if you want war with the United States of America, there's one thing I can promise you, so help me God: Someone else will raise your sons and daughters."

But you sure do love living in a free nation and pretending that no evil exists.

The entire world is not what you experience. You sleep in peace ...

2026-07-23T14:45:33Z

In reply to nevent1q…4lj5
_________________________

The entire world is not what you experience. You sleep in peace at night.

https://www.iranintl.com/en/202601255198

And on your “draining SPR” comment, we are net exporters as of recently and have trade relations with the largest oil depot in Venezuela now.

You do “trust the experts”. You just selectively choose what ...

2026-07-23T14:20:13Z

In reply to nevent1q…4lj5
_________________________

You do “trust the experts”. You just selectively choose what to trust them on. I could think of a thousand examples. Are the experts perfect? Absolutely not.

“Deductive reasoning” is laughable. You can only know what you know. You don’t have the intel. Far from it. What you’re actually saying is you’re leaning on your bias. And you realize that chaos has been present in the Middle East for thousands of years? We aren’t creating that. Again, you’re elucidating your bias.

Joe Kent? Really? He was pushed to the periphery months before his resignation. NY Times, BBC. WaPo, all of them licked his story up and ran with it. Front page of every mainstream media. You should know better than that to be the entire story at this point. They’re the same ones that told you Biden won the election and there was no fraud. Now look at what’s being adjudicated.

Well that’s just it, isn’t it? You sleep under the blanket of ...

2026-07-23T13:14:21Z

In reply to nevent1q…gtfs
_________________________

Well that’s just it, isn’t it? You sleep under the blanket of safety and freedom, yet you chose to claim the Federal Government liars or whatever when they tell you that Iranian enrichment is a problem. You’re not privileged to the intel. You just read online and then become keenly aware of what threats are imminent.

Maybe breaking OPEC was in the interest of national security. Have you considered that? Because that’s what’s happening.

It wouldn’t be against Cuba. It would be for Cubans. I have ...

2026-07-16T09:00:53Z

In reply to nevent1q…sckw
_________________________

It wouldn’t be against Cuba. It would be for Cubans. I have personal friends, with family still there, who are asking for help. They own nothing and they’re not happy. There is no work because of the government and they’re only allowed electricity but for a couple hours a day.

What would you do instead?

2026-07-13T20:20:45Z

In reply to nevent1q…zp67
_________________________

What would you do instead?

Haha you can no longer search “Kaspa”. What’s that tell ya? ...

2026-07-06T10:32:36Z

Haha you can no longer search “Kaspa”. What’s that tell ya?

Luke has said a lot of things…

2026-06-18T02:17:53Z

In reply to nevent1q…mu9l
_________________________

Luke has said a lot of things…

Kaspa does.

2026-06-11T08:48:50Z

In reply to nevent1q…ctkn
_________________________

Kaspa does.

https://x.com/hashdag/status/2064338133831819591?s=20

2026-06-09T13:52:02Z

In reply to nevent1q…t9ag
_________________________

https://x.com/hashdag/status/2064338133831819591?s=20

Show me another L1 that does the same? Over emotional much?

2026-06-09T11:02:27Z

In reply to nevent1q…fv79
_________________________

Show me another L1 that does the same? Over emotional much?

All you’ve said is that what if the Devs fork it??? Nobody can ...

2026-06-09T08:43:07Z

In reply to nevent1q…39a6
_________________________

All you’ve said is that what if the Devs fork it??? Nobody can disagree! It’s just not true.

I’ll say it again. Without a 51% attack, the MuHash written in the header is unchangeable, and the UTXO snapshot matching that MuHash is unforgeable.

Does Kaspa have consensus at the moment? Yes. And if your argument is what happens when it doesn’t have consensus? Same as BTC in years past. Don’t run the syncing node if you’re worried about consensus.

Without a 51% attack, the MuHash written in the header is ...

2026-06-09T02:03:14Z

In reply to nevent1q…wd75
_________________________

Without a 51% attack, the MuHash written in the header is unchangeable, and the UTXO snapshot matching that MuHash is unforgeable.

Does Kaspa have consensus at the moment? Yes. And if your argument is what happens when it doesn’t have consensus? Same as BTC in years past. Don’t run the syncing node if you’re worried about consensus.

If you don’t like the syncing node, don’t run it. It’s that ...

2026-06-09T00:32:16Z

In reply to nevent1q…wd75
_________________________

If you don’t like the syncing node, don’t run it. It’s that simple.

If you don’t agree with a fork, you don’t sync. That’s ...

2026-06-09T00:26:54Z

In reply to nevent1q…wd75
_________________________

If you don’t agree with a fork, you don’t sync. That’s flatly plain. Idk why that’s contentious.

And sure, if you’re running no downloads on Bitcoin since ...

2026-06-09T00:08:55Z

In reply to nevent1q…wd75
_________________________

And sure, if you’re running no downloads on Bitcoin since 2010… give me a break.

Haha the AI just told you you were wrong about the math.

2026-06-09T00:08:11Z

In reply to nevent1q…wd75
_________________________

Haha the AI just told you you were wrong about the math.

I've given you 100 reasons you're wrong and you just ...

2026-06-08T21:26:18Z

In reply to nevent1q…yvs9
_________________________

I've given you 100 reasons you're wrong and you just can't understand. Last resort is to tell you to go prove yourself right.

If Kaspa is a 'delusion' and the security is just an ...

2026-06-08T15:29:35Z

In reply to nevent1q…8r0l
_________________________

If Kaspa is a 'delusion' and the security is just an illusion of blind trust, stop complaining about it on the internet. Go attack it. Go rent some hashrate, forge a fake UTXO commitment, wrap it in a dishonest GHOSTDAG proof, and crash the network. The code is open-source. The bounty is worth a lot of money.

But you won't, because you can't. You know that breaking the network requires 51%. You lost the argument on the math, so you tried to move the goalposts to human politics. You keep insisting that a Layer 1 network must be slow and clunky to be secure, but Kaspa proved that cutting-edge cryptography can separate data storage from real-time enforcement. You’re not defending decentralization anymore; you’re just an over emotional zealot that the trilemma was solved without Bitcoin.

You completely abandoned your original argument. You realized the ...

2026-06-08T15:22:46Z

In reply to nevent1q…8r0l
_________________________

You completely abandoned your original argument. You realized the cryptography works, so now you're trying to argue about human politics and hard forks. Guess what? If 100% of Bitcoin miners and developers decide to change Bitcoin's rules tomorrow, and a year passes, a fresh Bitcoin node downloading the latest software client will 'just ride along' and accept that history too. That isn't a Kaspa flaw; that is how software and social consensus work on every decentralized network in existence.

And your laptop bandwidth comment proves you still don't understand pruning. A fresh Kaspa node does not download or process every historical transaction worldwide. It downloads a light header proof and the current balance sheet. It takes minutes, not days, and it doesn't hog a thing.

You can keep playing philosopher and moving the goalposts, but the engineering speaks for itself. Kaspa verifies the present state using the unforgeable energy of the past. You don't need to be a historical archivist to be sovereign.

You just laid out the sync process perfectly, but you missed the ...

2026-06-08T11:10:58Z

In reply to nevent1q…u2q4
_________________________

You just laid out the sync process perfectly, but you missed the foundational rule of cryptography: A miner cannot dictate the hash; the math dictates the hash. You claim the node just confirms the UTXO set matches the number the miner wrote into the header, without knowing if the transactions were valid. But a miner cannot just write any random number they want. The ⁠utxo_commitment⁠ is a strict mathematical result of the ledger's entire history. If a miner tried to bake fake coins into that history a year ago, every honest node online at that exact second would have rejected the block instantly. That invalid block would have been orphaned and left in the dust. The only way that 'fake coin' hash could become the heaviest, valid Pruning Point Proof handed to a fresh node today is if the rogue miners successfully sustained a 51% attack against the honest network for an entire year. Kaspa didn't abandon verification. Kaspa realized that if an honest majority enforces the rules in real-time, the resulting Proof-of-Work header chain becomes an unforgeable cryptographic proof of the valid ledger state. You don't need to turn your hard drive into a museum of ancient data to enforce the rules of the present.

It’s sad to me you don’t understand this.

Facts.

2026-06-08T09:14:00Z

In reply to nevent1q…q32k
_________________________

Facts.

I never said Kaspa uses ZK-proofs; I used ZK and succinct ...

2026-06-08T02:39:27Z

In reply to nevent1q…uflf
_________________________

I never said Kaspa uses ZK-proofs; I used ZK and succinct blockchains as examples to smash your primitive idea that you can't verify a ledger's validity without keeping every raw text file from 2015. A Kaspa pruned node doesn't run in 'SPV mode' like a light wallet—it holds and actively enforces the full UTXO ledger state. It just uses a thermodynamic header proof to verify how that state was reached instead of buying a 2TB hard drive to host a museum of dead data. But thank you for finally being honest at the end: 'L1 is supposed to be slow and small.' That's your real argument. It's not about math or security; it's a religious dogma. You believe a blockchain has to be slow to be pure. Kaspa solved the trilemma on Layer 1 using physics and mathematics.

You clearly have no idea what you’re talking about.

2026-06-08T02:30:09Z

In reply to nevent1q…uflf
_________________________

You clearly have no idea what you’re talking about.

It’s clear you don’t understand cryptography or ...

2026-06-07T20:05:22Z

In reply to nevent1q…sfe9
_________________________

It’s clear you don’t understand cryptography or zero-knowledge logic. I’ve explained to you why you’re wrong and you’re just repeating the same wrong arguments.

YOU DO NOT NEED THE DATA TO PROVE THE MATH.

It really is the great paradox of Bitcoin maximalist religious zealots. They worship at the altar of mathematics and cryptography, yet they completely reject what cryptographic math is actually capable of achieving. They confuse data archiving with consensus validation. Your position is the only way to verify the state is to read every historical receipt (which you’ve never done). You need to study Merkle Trees, Polynomial Commitments, and Zero-Knowledge proofs. These proofs demonstrate with absolute mathematical certainty that a specific computational process was followed correctly, without needing to reveal or store the raw data that went into it.

Bot.

2026-06-07T18:45:04Z

In reply to nevent1q…fj29
_________________________

Bot.

You’re incorrect. Read above.

2026-06-07T18:36:25Z

In reply to nevent1q…jppt
_________________________

You’re incorrect. Read above.

You’re failing to separate data storage from mathematical ...

2026-06-07T17:54:56Z

In reply to nevent1q…t7yp
_________________________

You’re failing to separate data storage from mathematical constraints.

Your argument is: "If you don’t manually read the script of a transaction from 2023, you can't verify if it broke your rules." You think that a miner could have sneakily broken a consensus rule (like printing 10 million fake coins) back in 2023, and that an archival node can just hand you a modern UTXO snapshot with those fake coins in it, and your pruned node will accept it because the snapshot is "consistent" with history.

That is mathematically impossible.

To understand the pruning point proof, you have to look at what is stamped inside a Kaspa block header. A block header doesn't just hold arbitrary text; it contains a Merkle Root Hash of the UTXO state. Every single time a block is mined, the miner has to calculate the new state of the ledger. If a miner in 2023 tried to execute an invalid script or forge fake coins, every honest node online at that second would calculate the state change, see that it broke the rules, and reject the block. The honest network would refuse to build on it.

Kaspa uses an advanced cryptographic structural backbone called a Posterity Chain (built on the principles of NiPoPoWs). Block headers don’t just point to their immediate parents. Every block header cryptographically commits to an exponential mathematical "skip-list" of ancestral block headers stretching all the way back to the Genesis block. It is a mathematically sampled backbone of history.

[Genesis] ——> (skips) ——> [posterity]

When your node boots up completely blank, it asks the network for the Pruning Point Proof. This file contains zero transaction data—it is purely a light chain of these interconnected, mathematically sampled Posterity Block Headers spanning from Genesis directly to the modern Pruning Point.

Your node takes this proof and puts it through a strict mathematical interrogation:
-It verifies the proof starts at the hardcoded, unchangeable Genesis block.
-It hashes the headers sequentially to ensure the mathematical line is completely unbroken.
-It reads the difficulty targets inside those headers and calculates the total accumulated Proof-of-Work (PoW). Because PoW requires physical energy, an attacker cannot write fake headers; they would have to burn millions of dollars in real-world electricity to generate a fraudulent proof heavy enough to fool your node.
-Once your node confirms that these headers represent the mathematically heaviest, legitimate chain in existence, it looks at the Merkle Root Hash printed inside that final Pruning Point Header. It then hashes the downloaded UTXO Snapshot.

If the hashes match perfectly, the snapshot is verified.

You ask: "Valid by whose rules?" Valid by the rules of the honest network that spent years of thermodynamic energy building that chain. If a miner in 2023 had printed fake coins, the honest network would have rejected that block. The heavy, legitimate posterity chain would have bypassed it entirely.
If an archival node tried to alter the historical database today to sneak those fake coins into the UTXO snapshot they hand you, the Merkle Root Hash of that dirty UTXO set would change. It would no longer match the Merkle Root printed inside the mathematically proven Pruning Point Header. Your node would see the mismatch and instantly throw the snapshot in the trash.

You are fundamentally confusing data availability with cryptographic verification. A Kaspa node doesn't need to read a script from 2023 to know it followed the rules, because a valid modern UTXO hash cannot physically or mathematically exist if the history preceding it contained an invalid rule change. The math of the current state is the proof of the past. The Pruning Point Proof uses a cryptographic posterity chain to prove that the snapshot you are holding is the mathematically unbroken continuation of Genesis, secured by the heaviest accumulation of physical energy on the network.

I think part of your problem is you don’t understand a pruning ...

2026-06-07T14:44:42Z

In reply to nevent1q…c8pu
_________________________

I think part of your problem is you don’t understand a pruning point proof. A pruning point proof uses cryptographic sampling (similar to FlyClient/NiPoPoW architectures) to allow a node to verify the cumulative difficulty of the entire history using just headers. Because a valid modern UTXO hash can only be generated if every single transaction in history followed the rules, proving the validity of the header tip mathematically proves the validity of the snapshot state. You aren't bypassing verification; you are using math to verify the ledger state while throwing away the historical data storage. Kaspa separates enforcing the rules from archiving the past.

You claim because an installer tool like Kai streamlines node ...

2026-06-07T14:36:44Z

In reply to nevent1q…c8pu
_________________________

You claim because an installer tool like Kai streamlines node updates, the developer team completely controls the network and forces changes on everyone. You’re confusing a convenience GUI tool with consensus rules. If a tool like Kai downloads an updated node client, it is just a streamlined delivery mechanism. The operator still runs the machine. If the core developers included a malicious rule change in that update (like changing the coin supply), the node software would run, but it would instantly reject the blocks produced by miners who didn't update, or vice versa. Bitcoin has tools exactly like this. Umbrel, Raspiblitz, and Start9 are incredibly popular one-click installers that make running a Bitcoin node dummy-proof. Does everybody use these? Certainly not. Are one-click installers and argument agains a protocol… no, man. Does running a Bitcoin node via Umbrel mean you are "just a pawn to an auto-updating dev schedule"? No. It means you are using modern software convenience to run an independent consensus engine.

If miners choose to run a new hard-fork update but you want to stick to the old rules, you are helpless. This is literally how Proof-of-Work works across the board, including Bitcoin. If 100% of miners switch to a new fork and 0% stay on the old chain, the old chain dies from a lack of blocks. That isn't a "Kaspa flaw", that is the fundamental reality of Nakamoto Consensus. If nobody spends electricity to mine your preferred rule set, your ledger stands still. However, if a portion of the community and miners refuse the change, the chain splits. This happened with Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash in 2017. If Kaspa devs push a change the community hates, the exact same split occurs. The node operator always has the final say on what rules their local machine considers valid.

Trusting that a historic UTXO set was agreed upon by past nodes is just a fancy social agreement, not hard cryptographic proof. This is where your pure ideological stance blindingly rejects math. A Kaspa pruned node doesn't just "take the network's word for it." It verifies a Pruning Point Proof. This is a compact, cryptographic proof of the heaviest chain headers back to Genesis. Because of the absolute unforgeable cost of Proof-of-Work, you cannot fake that proof without spending millions of dollars in real-world electricity. The node uses physics to prove that the ledger history is unbroken. You say, "You cannot meaningfully prove anything about the past." If that’s true, then cryptography as a science doesn't exist. You don't need to manually read a bank statement from three years ago to mathematically verify that a digital vault's current signature matches the ledger balance today. The math of the current state inherently contains the validated proof of everything that came before it.

You're confusing user-friendly node management software with the underlying protocol consensus. Tools like ⁠mykai.dev⁠ are just the Kaspa equivalent of Umbrel or Raspiblitz on Bitcoin. If someone doesn't like or trust a manager tool like Kai, they can bypass it entirely. Anyone can go directly to the official, core Kaspa GitHub repository, download the raw source code or pre-compiled binaries written by the core development team, and run ⁠it⁠ directly from a command line terminal. Don’t lose the forrest for the trees. Your argument is nonsensical.

A Kaspa node operator running a pruned ledger uses thermodynamic Proof-of-Work proofs to verify the absolute validity of the current state. It doesn't need to waste gigabytes of hard drive space hosting a museum of dead data from years ago to enforce the live rules of the network today. Bitcoin scaled by pushing users off the base layer onto centralized or clunky Layer 2s because it refused to optimize its plumbing. Kaspa optimized the plumbing using a BlockDAG so normal people can actually settle transactions on Layer 1.

You don’t understand. And that’s ok. I’m used to it at this point.

You are incorrect about the computer science of how a Kaspa node ...

2026-06-07T13:35:57Z

In reply to nevent1q…fucr
_________________________

You are incorrect about the computer science of how a Kaspa node actually handles state transitions and verifies data. You are arguing against a "strawman" version of how a pruned node operates.

You think a UTXO snapshot is just an unverified text file handed to you by an archival node, and you just blindly cross your fingers and accept it because it has a high Proof-of-Work score. The UTXO snapshot is not just "timestamped in the DAG", it is cryptographically bound to the BlockDAG’s virtual state. When a Kaspa node syncs, it downloads a Pruning Point Proof. This is a compact cryptographic proof. This proof mathematically demonstrates that the block header containing the hash of that UTXO set sits at the tip of an unbroken, valid chain of accumulated work leading directly back to Genesis. The node does verify the math: it verifies that creating this exact snapshot would require an attacker to expend more thermodynamic energy than the entire honest Kaspa network has produced since inception.

You assume that because you aren't checking a transaction from two years ago, a miner could have sneaked an invalid transaction into the past and ruined the current state without you knowing. This completely ignores how a UTXO ledger works. You cannot "build" a valid modern block on top of an invalid historical transaction because invalid transactions destroy the mathematical continuity of the UTXO set. If a miner in 2024 tried to create fake coins out of thin air, that block would be rejected by every node online at that moment. If an archival node tried to alter the historical database to include that fake transaction and feed it to a syncing node today, the resulting UTXO Merkle root hash would change. The new node would compare the hash of the dirty UTXO set to the mathematically proven headers and say, "The hashes do not match. This snapshot is fraudulent." You don't need to read a 3-year-old receipt to know the state is valid.

Yes, you pick what has the most Proof-of-Work. That is literally Bitcoin’s consensus mechanism. Nakamoto Consensus states that the valid chain is the one with the most accumulated energy. You're acting as though Bitcoin full nodes don't rely on PoW to determine the valid chain. If a Bitcoin node is presented with two chains that both follow the software rules, it always chooses the one with the most PoW. PoW is the ultimate arbiter of truth in both systems.

If an attacker had the computational power to rewrite Kaspa’s history, falsify a Pruning Point Proof, forge the cumulative PoW of the global network, and trick a syncing node into accepting a fake UTXO set, they would also have the exact same power that's needed to 51% attack. You keep calling it an SPV wallet. An SPV wallet downloads headers and assumes the transactions inside are valid without checking the rules. A Kaspa pruned node downloads a cryptographically secured state and fully validates every live transaction against the rules. Bitcoin maxis have a quasi-religious belief that if a node doesn't store a record of a meme inscribed on a block from three years ago, it isn't secure. Kaspa uses math and the laws of thermodynamics to prove that the current state is valid, throwing away the historical bloat so the base layer can actually scale. You aren't arguing against a security flaw, you're just arguing against a different design philosophy

Respectfully, you are claiming things that are not real, to be real.

A Kaspa pruned node fully and independently validates every ...

2026-06-07T10:22:19Z

In reply to nevent1q…qujs
_________________________

A Kaspa pruned node fully and independently validates every single transaction and block within its active consensus window. It executes the exact same validation code as an archival node. It calculates the cryptographic state changes itself. The only thing it does is discard the data once it passes the pruning point.

A Bitcoin SPV node does not verify transactions at all. An SPV node download headers, looks at the Merkle root, and says, "Well, the miners put this transaction in a block, so I guess it’s valid." It completely skips checking for double-spends or fake coins.

They are not the same at all.

You assume that because you don't have the data from 2023, you cannot verify the state today. But in a UTXO-based ledger, the current UTXO set is the condensed, mathematically proven result of all previous history. If a miner tried to invent fake coins out of thin air in 2023, the resulting UTXO set today would have an invalid cryptographic hash. A Kaspa node would instantly reject the snapshot because the cumulative Proof-of-Work headers wouldn't match.

Even on a full node in Bitcoin, if a user running a full node discovers a bad transaction from 2013 today, they cannot change it. If they try to unilaterally "blacklist" that old block, their node will simply split from the network, put itself on an isolated, useless island, and they will be left completely alone.

You are confusing data storage with consensus validation. A Bitcoin SPV node checks zero rules and trusts miners blindly. A Kaspa pruned node checks all rules for current consensus and trusts nobody. It executes full cryptographic verification of every block and transaction in its window.

If your definition of decentralization requires every participant to host a permanent archive of historical coffee purchases from three years ago on a Raspberry Pi, then yes, Kaspa doesn't fit your definition. But if decentralization means that any user can independently enforce the current rules of the network, prevent inflation, and validate their own financial state using raw math and Proof-of-Work, then a Kaspa node is as much of a full node as Bitcoin—it just throws away the trash when it's done.

Again, you don’t understand, and that’s ok. I’m used to it. Bitcoin religious zealots are many.

That’s not how pruned nodes work. The claim that a pruned node ...

2026-06-07T00:46:11Z

In reply to nevent1q…ejn7
_________________________

That’s not how pruned nodes work. The claim that a pruned node "doesn't replay anything" is fundamentally false. A Kaspa pruned node absolutely does validate and replay blocks within the pruning depth window. It independently calculates consensus for all current traffic; it just throws away old historical data after it has been finalized by the network's cumulative Proof-of-Work.

A pruned node verifies the current heaviest chain/DAG headers. For an archival node to successfully feed a "lie" (a fake UTXO snapshot) to a newly syncing pruned node, an attacker would have to secretly mine a fake history with more accumulated Proof-of-Work than the entire real global Kaspa hashrate.

You’re just wrong because you don’t understand. And that’s ok. I’m used to that.

Kaspa has thousands of nodes. Counting publically available and saying that’s the totality is dishonest. Public nodes alone have spike over 1,000. The high throughput guarantees this. You have to cut latency. You’re making an assumption that’s illogical I counting only public nodes. Solo mining is the point.

Peer connections aren't a hidden vulnerability that breaks the cryptography of the network. It is a bottleneck, to be sure, but it doesn’t upend the project.

Yes. And you can too: https://mykai.dev/

2026-06-06T18:04:40Z

In reply to nevent1q…t35t
_________________________

Yes. And you can too: https://mykai.dev/

Care to clarify objectively what you mean by “running Kaspa”?

2026-06-06T16:10:24Z

In reply to nevent1q…z3n8
_________________________

Care to clarify objectively what you mean by “running Kaspa”?

Typical Bitcoin religious zealot. Makes am unfounded claim and ...

2026-06-06T05:13:12Z

In reply to nevent1q…5s5d
_________________________

Typical Bitcoin religious zealot. Makes am unfounded claim and when asked to explain, can’t. I’ve had this conversation over and over and over again.

Why do you think it’s a delusion?

2026-06-04T19:25:52Z

In reply to nevent1q…5s5d
_________________________

Why do you think it’s a delusion?

Ever looked at the comparison or water usage between data centers ...

2026-05-30T20:30:29Z

In reply to nevent1q…xke4
_________________________

Ever looked at the comparison or water usage between data centers and golf courses? Pretty funny.

@npub1f4u…r407

2026-05-27T21:12:59Z

In reply to nevent1q…fxj8
_________________________

flash (npub1f4u…r407)

🤣

2026-05-27T01:46:30Z

In reply to nevent1q…7lcx
_________________________

🤣

There are hundreds of ongoing cases regarding Epstein files. ...

2026-05-25T04:00:37Z

In reply to nevent1q…68vj
_________________________

There are hundreds of ongoing cases regarding Epstein files. Judges have to redact info. Not all redactions are from the DOJ. Likely a minority. Victims have to be protected, collateral damage has to be avoided, a fair trial has to be preserved, etc.

Never sell your Bitcoin was stupid from the beginning.

2026-05-19T10:47:44Z

In reply to nevent1q…akde
_________________________

Never sell your Bitcoin was stupid from the beginning.

Kaspa’s testnet just successfully forked to accomplish ...

2026-05-19T01:39:40Z

Kaspa’s testnet just successfully forked to accomplish something almost everybody said a proof of work protocol could never do. Kaspa made history today, in the name of feeedom and sovereignty, and almost no one in Bitcoin cares. We have lost our way.

Haha did you see the part where her sister mysteriously drowned ...

2026-05-12T18:30:14Z

In reply to nevent1q…cdnu
_________________________

Haha did you see the part where her sister mysteriously drowned in a 1 car accident?

As someone who is a POW maxi and has done a lot of advocating for ...

2026-05-06T11:00:46Z

In reply to nevent1q…jc8t
_________________________

As someone who is a POW maxi and has done a lot of advocating for BTC and Kaspa, BTC maxis have treated me awful. Unwilling to engage in objective discussions and quickly revert to name calling and slander. Not only that, many of them don’t understand how lightening works or know the first thing about Kaspa. 99% of the time they say something that is on its face wrong.

Well said. I just don’t know why he doesn’t embrace Kaspa. ...

2026-05-05T19:35:04Z

In reply to nevent1q…v723
_________________________

Well said. I just don’t know why he doesn’t embrace Kaspa. Vlad (npub12qz…pdx8)

Kaspa.

2026-05-05T14:01:21Z

In reply to nevent1q…jwe7
_________________________

Kaspa.

An imitation of Trump would be the antithesis.

2026-05-04T23:50:35Z

In reply to nevent1q…43hr
_________________________

An imitation of Trump would be the antithesis.

Nobody is mad at a bad take. It’s the lack of humility that’s ...

2026-05-04T17:46:48Z

In reply to nevent1q…fxr7
_________________________

Nobody is mad at a bad take. It’s the lack of humility that’s sad.

But you had YS on for 10 hours but won’t say a word about Kaspa ...

2026-05-02T04:07:40Z

In reply to nevent1q…a8v5
_________________________

But you had YS on for 10 hours but won’t say a word about Kaspa any longer. LTC? Really?

So, no.

2026-04-28T08:34:07Z

In reply to nevent1q…0e2w
_________________________

So, no.

What evidence do you have that it was staged?

2026-04-27T14:26:58Z

In reply to nevent1q…sd5g
_________________________

What evidence do you have that it was staged?

But that’s not what the transaction data says?

2026-04-26T23:02:02Z

In reply to nevent1q…vv5x
_________________________

But that’s not what the transaction data says?

The first thing we know about men is that we were made in God’s ...

2026-04-26T02:28:08Z

In reply to nevent1q…n2q7
_________________________

The first thing we know about men is that we were made in God’s image. The second thing we know is that God put us to work in the garden. The third is that it’s not good for man to be alone. (Genesis)

Your identity is who you are in Christ.
You were made to work.
Your work provides for her and those you create.

God doesn’t care if you go to Eastern or State. He doesn’t care if you’re a plumber or a MD. Your purpose is not in the details. Give of yourself daily.

Yonatan Sompolinsky is Satoshi.

2026-04-22T18:51:07Z

In reply to nevent1q…mmr2
_________________________

Yonatan Sompolinsky is Satoshi.

https://x.com/BitcoinErrorLog/status/2038882467688444065

2026-04-22T02:11:45Z

In reply to nevent1q…sjlq
_________________________

https://x.com/BitcoinErrorLog/status/2038882467688444065

🤣

2026-04-21T10:37:33Z

In reply to nevent1q…e05h
_________________________

🤣

He has no evidence. He editorializes all day long and begs for ...

2026-04-19T10:15:38Z

In reply to nevent1q…p6ms
_________________________

He has no evidence. He editorializes all day long and begs for money. His channel has gotten worse and worse over the years.

I completely agree. Bitcoin isn’t suitable for small every day ...

2026-04-18T12:13:13Z

In reply to nevent1q…3wdn
_________________________

I completely agree. Bitcoin isn’t suitable for small every day payments and anybody that says lightning fixes that is giving up sovereignty, antithesis to the white paper.

So if you HODL hard you should lose your Bitcoin? What’s the ...

2026-04-17T20:58:25Z

In reply to nevent1q…huuw
_________________________

So if you HODL hard you should lose your Bitcoin? What’s the argument you’re making?

Listen, either the core developers are going to censor those ...

2026-04-17T20:48:39Z

In reply to nevent1q…gfq4
_________________________

Listen, either the core developers are going to censor those addresses, or quantum computing is going to censor those addresses according to the sources I cited above

Well, that’s not true at all. 36% of the protocol will be ...

2026-04-17T20:42:53Z

In reply to nevent1q…tly4
_________________________

Well, that’s not true at all. 36% of the protocol will be stolen. The Godlike, character of Satoshi‘s fair launch and 1 million bitcoin will disappear.

This is where I would encourage you to look at the numbers. We ...

2026-04-17T20:41:42Z

In reply to nevent1q…w79p
_________________________

This is where I would encourage you to look at the numbers. We already have quantum computing. The field is growing rapidly. Physical and logical cubits are growing year after a year. If the bitcoin protocol can’t secure the transfer of value, there will be a protocol that will in cryptography. That is the incentive to understand what is going on.

I love that you have me muted, and yet you still continue to ...

2026-04-17T20:39:25Z

In reply to nevent1q…snvs
_________________________

I love that you have me muted, and yet you still continue to respond to me. Tell me you have a problem without telling me have a problem.

If the Bitcoin is stolen through faults of the original protocol, ...

2026-04-17T20:24:52Z

In reply to nevent1q…jguc
_________________________

If the Bitcoin is stolen through faults of the original protocol, how is that any different than freezing the Bitcoin?

And yet you popped out of nowhere to interact with me haha. ...

2026-04-17T20:23:43Z

In reply to nevent1q…eaf6
_________________________

And yet you popped out of nowhere to interact with me haha. I’ll take it as a compliment. I’ve never seen somebody try to hard to yell and cuss at somebody through a keyboard that they claim to have muted.

Name a topic I’ve avoided. I’ve addressed everything you’ve ...

2026-04-17T20:22:49Z

In reply to nevent1q…f042
_________________________

Name a topic I’ve avoided. I’ve addressed everything you’ve said head on. Even the incorrect stuff. If you made a claim, I’ve asked a question for you to substantiate your claim. It’s very simple.

The fact that you’re looking for validation from Meyer should concern you. He is not well and clearly has issues.

Your life to throw away if you’re not, not mine.

2026-04-17T20:12:03Z

In reply to nevent1q…g0xn
_________________________

Your life to throw away if you’re not, not mine.

You brought it up, not me.

2026-04-17T20:11:24Z

In reply to nevent1q…2su5
_________________________

You brought it up, not me.

You’re going to pay taxes in Bitcoin?

2026-04-17T20:07:56Z

In reply to nevent1q…33za
_________________________

You’re going to pay taxes in Bitcoin?

You’re speculating that the market recovers. Don’t you think ...

2026-04-17T20:07:05Z

In reply to nevent1q…rh7y
_________________________

You’re speculating that the market recovers. Don’t you think Saykor will go under? Don’t you think large miners will file bankruptcy?

You absolutely do. You’re appeal to authority every day. ...

2026-04-17T20:04:02Z

In reply to nevent1q…l8lk
_________________________

You absolutely do. You’re appeal to authority every day. There’s all kinds of stuff you don’t know, but you trust the manufacturers, or the contractor, or the coder. You name it. Did you take the COVID vaccine? I didn’t. I gave authority to a different set of individuals.

You don’t think there’s people that would like to overtake the BTC protocol? There’s a lot of reasons to speculate.

I’m not saying there is, NIST, Google, Loop said it, Deloitte, ...

2026-04-17T19:52:27Z

In reply to nevent1q…m876
_________________________

I’m not saying there is, NIST, Google, Loop said it, Deloitte, Chaincode said there is. I guess you know better than all of them? I’m willing to bet you haven’t dug into what they’ve said, you’re choosing to blindly argue that it’s a non-issue.

You’re ok with 1/3 of the Bitcoin supply reentering the market? Do you have any idea what that would do to the market? Think about that. Value would vanish quickly.

Yet you keep responding emotionally unhinged and can’t ...

2026-04-17T19:49:04Z

In reply to nevent1q…jxhc
_________________________

Yet you keep responding emotionally unhinged and can’t objectively address the argument.

There’s a difference in proactive and reactive. Proactive is ...

2026-04-17T19:41:26Z

In reply to nevent1q…kf3s
_________________________

There’s a difference in proactive and reactive. Proactive is before the problem arrives. Reactive is after. Surprised I have to explain that. The point of reference is the actual threat, not identification of it.

So you’re good with 6 million-ish BTC being stolen from individuals and being monetized? Have you thought about this? You don’t think that affects the protocol?

So you’re ok with one centralized entity stealing 36% of ...

2026-04-17T19:36:52Z

In reply to nevent1q…9ch6
_________________________

So you’re ok with one centralized entity stealing 36% of Bitcoin?
Weird. That’s a hot take.

I’m not saying BIP-361 is a better solution, I don’t think it is. But all you’ve done so far is yell and cuss at me for raising the issue. All while saying you have me blocked… pretty comical while sad at the same time.

I agree. It’s not a solution.

2026-04-17T19:34:00Z

In reply to nevent1q…sjlq
_________________________

I agree. It’s not a solution.

So Satoshi should move his coins?

2026-04-17T19:32:40Z

In reply to nevent1q…9ch6
_________________________

So Satoshi should move his coins?

And yet here you are writing to me with uncontrolled anger. Think ...

2026-04-17T19:31:51Z

In reply to nevent1q…esle
_________________________

And yet here you are writing to me with uncontrolled anger. Think about that.

Watch him not answer. What are your thoughts on BIP-361? ...

2026-04-17T18:31:42Z

Watch him not answer. What are your thoughts on BIP-361?

quoting
nevent1q…27tn
Go fuck yourself shitcoiner

Nobody is ignoring it…we just don’t agree with people that aren’t actually bitcoiners trying to rush us into some premature solution

Love how you constantly throw out bullshit strawman arguments though

Making my point.

2026-04-17T18:30:15Z

In reply to nevent1q…27tn
_________________________

Making my point.

He has me muted, yet here he is engaging in a conversation that ...

2026-04-17T18:30:01Z

In reply to nevent1q…jy27
_________________________

He has me muted, yet here he is engaging in a conversation that he can’t see the half of…

My biggest issue with the Bitcoin maxi community is their inability to have objective conversations about anything. It’s turned into a religion. They think Satoshi is God. It’s a joke. And if you raise any questions to discuss anything whatsoever, you automatically are framed as a shitcoiner and muted. If you don’t see the problem with this, then you’re not part of any solution.

I’ll post it again since you avoided it the first time (you ...

2026-04-17T18:27:32Z

In reply to nevent1q…zym3
_________________________

I’ll post it again since you avoided it the first time (you also failed to acknowledge your difficulty reading, but we’ll let that slide.):

Don’t like NIST? Fine. Google said. Loop said it. Deloitte said it. Chaincode said it. You can dismiss anybody because you don’t like them, but that doesn’t change the fact that P2PK coins are going to be stolen if something isn’t done.

I didn’t tell you to fall in line with my solution. But you ...

2026-04-17T18:25:41Z

In reply to nevent1q…zym3
_________________________

I didn’t tell you to fall in line with my solution. But you certainly haven’t addressed the issue. You just ignore it. That’s the claim. Putting your feet up and saying quantum computer as a sigh up is just factually wrong at this point. You don’t like NIST? Fine. It doesn’t change the objectivity.

Burying your head in the sand isn’t a solution.

2026-04-17T17:38:46Z

In reply to nevent1q…8vdc
_________________________

Burying your head in the sand isn’t a solution.

I guess reading is hard. I literally wrote, don’t be reactive. ...

2026-04-17T17:38:16Z

In reply to nevent1q…8vdc
_________________________

I guess reading is hard. I literally wrote, don’t be reactive. So there’s that…

Don’t like NIST? Fine. Google said. Loop said it. Deloitte said it. Chaincode said it. You can dismiss anybody because you don’t like them, but that doesn’t change the fact that P2PK coins are going to be stolen if something isn’t done.

And Iran continues to wither on its way to nonexistent. FAFO. Put ...

2026-04-17T16:34:12Z

And Iran continues to wither on its way to nonexistent. FAFO.

Put an asterisk by the name of anybody that told you Iran was winning and/or was going to win. You’ll want to think twice before talking to them.

quoting
nevent1q…arqh
The United States and Iran have made progress in negotiations over a three-page memorandum of understanding aimed at ending the war, according to U.S. officials and sources familiar with the talks cited by Axios. The proposed framework includes a “voluntary” multi-year halt on Iranian nuclear enrichment and the transfer of some highly enriched uranium to a third country, in exchange for the release of billions of dollars in frozen Iranian assets.

They are looking at the NIST (National Institute of Standards and ...

2026-04-17T16:10:19Z

In reply to nevent1q…g6kc
_________________________

They are looking at the NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) guidelines.
NIST officially declared in 2024 that ECDSA (Bitcoin’s math) is "not quantum-resistant". This has been validated over and over again. You realize the math has already been solved? Once the hardware is here, it’s time to be reactive. You don’t want to be reactive.

You can say something if you want, but that doesn’t make it true.

So I know we were talking about miner revenue, but I said the ...

2026-04-16T17:17:21Z

In reply to nevent1q…hdmz
_________________________

So I know we were talking about miner revenue, but I said the above to say, the protocol is going to change and I don’t think there’s much sense in discussing miner revenue. Bitcoin is a technology. It’s meant to be upgraded, like all tech. Satoshi isn’t God (despite some pretending like it’s a religion). Where I largely differ from most of the toxic Bitcoin community is you’re automatically a shitcoiner if you use your brain and say something objectively true that flys in the face of their faith.

Quantum (likely 2030s) will steal roughly 34% of BTC unless ...

2026-04-16T17:09:38Z

In reply to nevent1q…hdmz
_________________________

Quantum (likely 2030s) will steal roughly 34% of BTC unless there’s a hard fork. This isn’t me speculating, this is conceded across the board. Changing the post quantum signatures won’t change this. Core devs are proposing stealing unmoved Bitcoin. That’s the actual proposal. BIP-361. They’re marketing it as a soft fork, but it’s not. Technically, yes, the soft fork tightens the rules. Old nodes will see a new signature and not recognize it, but it won’t violate any of their rules, so they allow it. In terms of a social contract, Satoshi will never be able to move his bitcoin again. That’s a hard fork. It’s his keys, but not his coin.

Vlad (nprofile…psyq) tell him where I’m wrong.

The kid just lies. I’m shocked people still think he’s an ...

2026-04-16T11:22:42Z

In reply to nevent1q…zm5l
_________________________

The kid just lies. I’m shocked people still think he’s an honest source of news. He just pushes biases for zaps.

🤣😂🤣 this is the most dishonest profile on NOSTR. The guy ...

2026-04-16T11:19:47Z

In reply to nevent1q…dey5
_________________________

🤣😂🤣 this is the most dishonest profile on NOSTR. The guy doesn’t say a single thing about Israel.

Nostr event nevent1qqsxhwvzfhrzpk8s5jduaxdqkr3df3hturxzfpkpf3l7s9sjxh37xpgzyzd0lym0scv5z8qxjts56740f8j9elvs369fc7ha83e2vjaqmj4lc4l5vqt

2026-04-15T10:47:18Z

You're not actually serious, are you Jeff Booth (nprofile…w2ua)? We want fast, cheap transactions that don't pay miners? And if your argument is that opening and closing channels will pay the miners, I don't think that's a reality in the chart below.

Source?

2026-04-09T14:30:27Z

In reply to nevent1q…hl6r
_________________________

Source?

You realize you said formal religions are dirty and then said a ...

2026-04-05T23:04:02Z

In reply to nevent1q…lz72
_________________________

You realize you said formal religions are dirty and then said a state of morality is the most productive. You see the irony there right?

The answer is, God is holy. Man is sinful. You’re conflating what should be corrupted by what is, us. This is the need for Jesus.

Couldn’t disagree more. Have you looked at Jesus?

2026-04-05T17:31:51Z

In reply to nevent1q…wp78
_________________________

Couldn’t disagree more. Have you looked at Jesus?

Haha yeah everybody believes the news that’s strictly regulated ...

2026-04-05T11:34:08Z

In reply to nevent1q…ne7a
_________________________

Haha yeah everybody believes the news that’s strictly regulated by the Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance and the Press Supervisory Board in Iran. When all that is allowed is State sponsored news, all you get it lies.

https://www.iranintl.com/en/202601255198

https://www.zerohedge.com/technology/iran-arrests-dozens-starlink-black-market-network

https://primal.net/e/nevent1qqs07dr7hghevx6mwqj0vtfk38t5ucs00j9px8q84tu4h4dqdyf2hggxtmvrv

https://bfsi.economictimes.indiatimes.com/articles/iran-launches-10-million-rial-note-highest-ever-denomination-as-war-deepens-economic-crisis/129730858