2025-02-22T14:54:33Z https://njump.cloud.vinney.xyz kreyszig https://njump.cloud.vinney.xyz/npub1qr95ly0ztlz2ds0lj2nw8m4wsv6aulz0yg2snysddfc9097es4uqrz99p4 https://njump.cloud.vinney.xyz/nevent1qqsd4dq8etzg4tkmkfmfkmqtc2w0t8r0f9kzal7khnjk7alcufc4nqgzyqqvknu3uf0uffkpl7f2dclw46pnthnufu3p2zvjp448q4uhmxzhsarj88d In reply to <a href='/nevent1qqsvuwqm4e8p6wq4eeeytkvwvm3asdspljkxx08lzswmseauhet84dspzamhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuurjd9kkzmpwdejhgtcratuzt'>nevent1q…tuzt</a><br/>_________________________<br/><br/>I am mostly worried that the risks for the network effects due to a potential chain split could far outweight the marginal benefits provided by BIP110. As I said I don&#39;t mind the signaling, but not at the cost of damaging the network effect. I would have been much more comfortable to signal if it had not been of the UASF. I would be fine with BIP110 activating with 90% support or failing with 5% support, but I would not like it if it activated with low but significant support. 2026-07-14T22:12:35Z https://njump.cloud.vinney.xyz/nevent1qqsts98hslh5k4tqj6aawx60a7dm5elc980mpnhq3te0mwdcfg7ajzszyqqvknu3uf0uffkpl7f2dclw46pnthnufu3p2zvjp448q4uhmxzhst5nfqd In reply to <a href='/nevent1qqsyszt3fu5rgkkx4xpzg3mu4fq0hkfd6kqpn4lpw32zhf67fgk3jhspzamhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuurjd9kkzmpwdejhgtcx5mwfa'>nevent1q…mwfa</a><br/>_________________________<br/><br/>I don&#39;t like spam, but my understanding is that BIP110 does not significantly increase the cost of spam (sub 1% for ordinals). I don&#39;t mind the signaling aspect of BIP110 as a way to protest Core, but at this point it seems Core lost any legitimacy and new clients will mostly take over. 2026-07-14T11:07:54Z https://njump.cloud.vinney.xyz/nevent1qqsqceysunph7cue96qxfcldyapzfr8ct84zsyzyy79d462230k63nqzyqqvknu3uf0uffkpl7f2dclw46pnthnufu3p2zvjp448q4uhmxzhswah3aa In reply to <a href='/nevent1qqstdny90hcctv8le4n9gp4vdtslmgp8rhwqsfms3ep6unzwsh9kjyspz4mhxue69uhkummnw3ezummcw3ezuer9wchslj57xu'>nevent1q…57xu</a><br/>_________________________<br/><br/>I don&#39;t have a strong view for or against BIP110, but I don&#39;t understand this type of statement and I am somewhat worried about the activation mechanism chosen through the UASF.<br/><br/>If most the nodes weighted by economic relevance and most of the hash power did not signal for BIP110, how could this constitute a contentious hardfork attempt, and why would it be abnormal for BIP110 to fail in this situation? 2026-07-14T00:24:03Z