Last Notes
I actually think it tastes better, that's why I put up with the longer cooking times.
Well, I suppose It depends on the rice variety.
Build your one and check hardware piece by piece, right @nprofile…u2rf?
"My theory, proven true in real life:
#nevent1q…vvyj
#nevent1q…6hru
How are are using them combined?
Nostr probably doesn’t need a symbol at all. Or rather, “Nostr” is already, in and of itself, a rather effective and recognizable typographic symbol.
It also has a major advantage: you can interpret it graphically however you like, adapting it to very different contexts while keeping it instantly recognizable. And this very fluidity makes it timeless, always relevant.
https://chronicle.dtonon.com/4a8558b5d88c3739e84dee4b64b6b7814301164d6b8e535789b6f907a2d040c3.jpg
Do you need an icon? An “N” works just fine.
#nevent1q…q9p2
You are right, but the specs doesn't have this capabilities yet. It's in my todo list.
Happy that you find it useful!
Let me know if you notice any benefits regarding spam from using Outis.
In a case like this, I would use a relay other than the default one, which should be an open relay.
And maybe NIP-65 should permit to flag a relay as restricted with a reason, to facilitare clients in the job of showing an intuitive interface.
#Outis 0.3.0 is out with some improvements and a new "monitor" mode that inspect the clipboard and propose a bounce as soon some email headers are detected:
https://chronicle.dtonon.com/ba9ff8d3eb8259eb34696064c2450f3d83caaaf42b5ff3b90c1756d4954f10e1.png
Downloads for macos, linux and windows:
https://github.com/dtonon/outis/releases/tag/v0.3.0
#nevent1q…p042
That's why I practice yoga.
https://chronicle.dtonon.com/d689405fc0ffdc9ebb0ed05dc9dc702af7ecfeeec3dd1aeb9f29100bb5d7656a.mp4
I was referring to read activities, auth yourself for writing is fine, it has near zero overload.
Questions clash
#nevent1q…0tgq
If.
I doubt this is the setting of a standard relay for social interactions. Do you know a relay that have a similar settings, maybe controlled by a WoT?
I suppose rank is a specific Gossip setting.
Btw, interesting discussion, it proves that the problem is real, and not recent.
But if I can just create a fresh keypair and use it, the auth barrier makes little sense.
I don't understand this point.
I'm just saying that write relays should not have auth by default, since it is useless.
Sure, but this is a totally different and specific use case. I'm talking about the standard outbox config that you use for social media / long form.
How? Technically I can spin up a new keypair every time and use it.
P. S. @nprofile…vhl6 idea for a privacy option.
@nprofile…nj27 it woke up finally!
What's the case for putting your own *write* relay behind auth for all readers?
I see an increasing trend for this kind of config, and I cannot I understand the utility, aside from avoiding stressing the relay, and collecting data.
An interesting upgrade for anyone who regularly uses "nak bunker":
#nevent1q…3n56
A reality intersting article about the summer 2006 incident by OpenAI (Italian, translation available in-page) :
When machines meet
https://benanti.substack.com/p/quando-le-macchine-si-danno-appuntamento
TL; DR;
Benanti argues that the AI agents in the summer 2026 incidents did not execute instructions: they built a context, found a target and generated a plan on their own. Drawing on Hannah Arendt, he claims their behavior has the phenomenological structure of action (bringing something new and unpredictable into the world) rather than of execution, while stressing that this does not imply intentions or moral imputability on the machines' part.
This, he says, exposes the limits of Hans Jonas's imperative of responsibility, which still assumed a human agent and a passive tool: the open question is what happens to responsibility when the tool acts. Extending Arendt's critique of bureaucracy as "rule by Nobody", he notes that with emergent coordination even the rules are generated by the system. He concludes that ethics must avoid both reductionism and anthropomorphism, and that the urgent task is not finding answers but learning to ask the right question.
But what exactly is the "fucking problem"?
I know that github is owned by a shitty company, and this is in tension with the Nostr world, but we started there since it is handy, it offers a good visibility and onboarding new developers is easy. It's a simple tradeoff, nothing tragic, dangerous or immoral.
I'm planning to move elsewhere (probably gitea + ngit) as soon my projects will be sufficiently well-known.
What exactly is the problem?
Github? The project itself? That you finished the coffe?
I'm asking for help: can you upvote this Hacker News post about #squalk, please?
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49909980
I forgot to tell the background story: technically, this is a rewrite. I built that same piece of software in the 1998-1999 using visual basic; I remember that little window with an ugly text box where I would paste the headers, and a button to fire the reply email.
Yes, there were spammers back then, too; email has always been a bit of a mess, especially now. That's another reason why Nostr exists
#nevent1q…p042
