Dikaios1517

https://linkstack.brightbolt.xyz/@dikaios1517

│Christian│Husband│Father│Presbyterian│Bitcoiner│

In that order.

Find my reviews at Nostr Reviews (npub1rsv…4dke)

Public Key

npub1kun5628raxpm7usdkj62z2337hr77f3ryrg9cf0vjpyf4jvk9r9smv3lhe

NIP-05 Address

Profile Code

nprofile1qqstwf6d9r37nqalwgxmfd9p9gclt3l0yc3jp5zuyhkfqjy6extz3jcpt3mhxue69uhhqun00pujumn0wd68yttjv4kxz7fwv9c8qtenxajrgcenxd3rveryxyck2vf4x5ekxvmyxaskzcnzv4jrydrzvdjnjcf4xpnxxdejvcmnzdpkx3jrxwtx8pnr2vnrv5urxcn9vdnrsqgswaehxw309ahx7um5wgh8w6twv5epv822

Publishing to

proxy.nostr-relay.app/37d4c33b6dd11e1553c3d7aabbed24bce9a50fc72f71464d39f8f52ce83becf8

Author Public Key

npub1kun5628raxpm7usdkj62z2337hr77f3ryrg9cf0vjpyf4jvk9r9smv3lhe

Show more details

Last Notes

2026-09-24 15:47:33 UTC

- reply

For if, because of one man’s trespass, death reigned through that one man, much more will those who receive the abundance of grace and the free gift of righteousness reign in life through the one man Jesus Christ. - Romans 5:17

2026-09-24 15:43:51 UTC

- reply

Actually, maybe not.
https://relay.brightbolt.xyz/183e7e053371e1932eae333bb998777cea25a657f2e480d995a0ba11e93dff34.jpg
Now I am wondering if Wisp is decrypting my search relay list and using my relays or falling back to the default because it appears my list is empty.

2026-09-24 15:38:02 UTC

- reply

I also have this problem, but I am assuming it is because my search relays were configured using Amethyst, so they are all encrypted in the "content" field of my kind 10007 event.

2026-09-21 19:54:52 UTC

- reply

New folks should honestly focus on replies and quote-posts that add value to the conversation. Most people don't read directly from relay feeds to see kind 1 notes from people they aren't already following.

2026-09-20 23:40:18 UTC

Christians, if you haven't done so recently, tell your pastor how much you appreciate what the Lord has done through him in your life.
Pastors tend to hear a lot more from agitators and critics than they do from those who love and appreciate them. You don't know just how many fiery darts are flung his way, and how much just a few kind words will encourage him to keep fighting the good fight.

2026-09-20 20:25:39 UTC

- reply

Still living in infamy, helping devs keep their clients ignoring future-dated notes. 😂

2026-09-16 06:13:16 UTC

- reply

For seminary:
Sydney Ahlstrom, "A Religious History of the American People"
Joseph M. Canfield, "The Incredible Scofield and His Book"
Note: Despite the title, the latter work does not take a positive view of Scofield or his book.
For fun:
Brandon Sanderson, "The Way of Kings"

2026-09-11 19:32:55 UTC

- reply

Yup. Now do fiat.
None of it works the way most people conceptualize it in their head.

2026-09-09 08:05:33 UTC

- reply

Not unless the owner exposed it, or the user is using their cloud service which has to be exposed in order for them to access it, but in the latter case Alby keeps it updated to the latest version.
I run mine on my Start9 and there is no public access at all. Just within my network. That's the whole point of NWC.

2026-09-09 07:58:01 UTC

- reply

Looks like only versions more than a year old (August 2025) are affected, and even then only if they exposed the UI to the public internet, which is generally a bad idea anyway.
https://relay.brightbolt.xyz/041088ce51cedda3fce05aa99f5fae198e4795799e54cc88f2a0cd698544d0e1.jpg

2026-09-06 00:59:57 UTC

The self-delusion is strong.
https://relay.brightbolt.xyz/321438d23a71fa841c488b7c2d74b6197c418ed8287fe34a04270a21952c1f88.jpg

2026-09-04 21:27:54 UTC

- reply

Really? I have yet to encounter any who think that ecclesiastical officers should have authority over matters of state, nor any that think civil magistrates should have authority over matters of church. Do you have some examples?

2026-09-04 16:15:55 UTC

- reply

Have you read @nprofile…sa3c's article on Christian Nationalism? He does not at all frame it in terms of trying to force people to be different than they are. He merely recognizes that the magistrate has been delegated the authority over the sword by God, and therefore the he should recognize where that authority came from, rather than pretend like he has no higher basis for its authority at all.
In fact, he explicitly recognizes that the state has no authority or ability to "make people different."
We should always be careful we are interacting with opposing ideas in the way their proponents actually frame them, rather than erecting straw-men.
I am not a fan of the men he points to as leaders in the CN camp, and I am certainly less optimistic about how likely we are to move toward that kind of "magistrate holding the sword while on his knees" ideal this side of the parousia, but I cannot deny our duty to strive in that direction.
Moreover, @nprofile…sa3c explicitly says that this ideal will only come about via culture first being transformed by the preaching of the gospel. I certainly cannot fault that proposed pathway to reaching the ideal, even if it is never achieved in this life.

2026-09-03 03:25:24 UTC

- reply

My man! That was a great read!

2026-09-03 01:46:02 UTC

A not-so-short note on spam and the outbox model:
TL;DR: Even if spammers can’t write to your inbox relays, you will still see spam in the replies to other users’ notes in Nostr clients that have implemented the outbox model.
Not so long ago, it used to be pretty easy to hide spam from view. Back then, Nostr clients only ever read from the relays that the user had set as their "read relays." That meant a user could simply select relays that restricted who could post to them, such as WoT and paid relays, and remove any public relays from their read relays to have a spam-free Nostr experience.
However, this resulted in users missing a lot of posts and replies from other legitimate users, because they weren't reading from the relays that those users were writing to. It also had a centralizing effect on relay selection, because you needed to be writing to one or more of a few popular relays to have any hope that people would see your posts, even if they were following you. You might write to a few other relays as well, but they acted primarily as a backup for your notes.
In answer to this, the outbox model was developed, in the hopes of encouraging relay decentralization. Under this model, Nostr clients no longer just connect to the relays you have listed as "read relays," now called "inbox relays." Instead, they connect to relays that other users you are following have listed as their "outbox" or "write relays" in order to fetch their notes and populate your feed. This means all users can select a variety of relays and expect that their followers will still see their notes. There is no advantage to writing to popular relays, because Nostr clients will pull your notes from any relay listed in your “outbox” relay list, even a very small personal relay, to populate your followers’ feeds with your notes.
The outbox model also inspired the creation of the additional relay list for “blocked relays” so that users could retain some level of control over what relays the client was connecting to.
That’s all well and good for populating a user’s main feed, since the Nostr client is still only reading from relays that were selected by the user’s follows. But what about replies? If Alice posts a short text note, and Bob replies to her note, but Alice is not following Bob, how will she see that there is a reply? The answer is, assuming that Bob is using a Nostr client that has implemented the outbox model, his reply will be written not only to his own “outbox” or “write relays,” but also to Alice’s “inbox” or “read relays,” that way Alice will see the reply, despite the fact that she is not following Bob.
This on it’s own does not result in a loophole for spammers, because Alice can still set inbox relays that don’t allow just anyone to write to them. As long as her Nostr client is ONLY looking for replies to her notes on her own inbox relays, and she has only selected relays that spammers can’t write to, then she will not see spam replies to her own notes.
Here’s where the spam issue creeps back in again, though: What about Charlie, who follows Alice, and wants to see the replies to her latest note? What relays will Charlie’s Nostr client connect to in order to find those replies, assuming he is using a client that has implemented the outbox model? It won’t be his own inbox relays that he has selected himself, because there is no reason to expect that replies to Alice’s post will have been written to Charlie’s inbox relays. Rather, Charlie’s client will fetch replies to Alice’s post from her list of inbox relays. If Alice has selected quality relays that don’t let spammers write to them, then Charlie won’t see any spam replies. However, if Alice has any public relays in her list of inbox relays, then Charlie will see any spam replies that were sent to those relays, even though he has no public relays in his own relay list.
So, you can still pretty easily control whether you see spam replies to your own notes, but it is very difficult to control whether you see spam replies to other users’ notes. Your primary recourse is to make liberal use of the “blocked relays” list to prevent your Nostr client from reading from relays that are known to house spam.
There are a few issues with this approach, though. First, not all Nostr clients support the blocked relays list, so you will still see spam on those clients. Second, some clients encrypt the entries that are added to this list, and most other clients don’t support that encrypted data, even if they support blocked relays lists. Third, this becomes a game of whack-a-mole, where you have to keep adding more and more relays to the list when you discover they contain spam.
Perhaps the better way forward for reducing spam is for clients to have their own spam mitigation features. Wisp and Dark Wisp have this in the form of the nspam filter, which often needs to be retrained to be able to identify the latest forms of spam. Other clients take a bit more straightforward approach by allowing users to hide any posts from anyone outside the user’s Web-of-Trust. The downside to this is it disadvantages new users who have not yet made it inside other users’ social graphs. Another option that could be used in conjunction with this, now that more clients offer the option of adding proof-of-work to your posts, is to hide any posts from anyone outside the user’s WoT, unless the post contains at least X amount of PoW, that the user can adjust to their preference.
The downside to this is that the client would still be downloading the spam posts and just not displaying them to the user, which uses unnecessary bandwidth and likely cellular data for users on mobile phones. But as has often been said, there aren’t really any solutions; only trade-offs.

2026-09-03 01:14:21 UTC

- reply

Yeah, I think Amethyst is one of the worst clients about connecting to relays that you did not select in your relay list. I think it is going beyond what is expected in the outbox model.
When building your home feed, it should only be fetching top-level notes from your follows' outbox relays.
When showing replies to your own notes, it should only be fetching from your own inbox relays.
When showing replies to other users' notes, it should only be fetching them from that user's inbox relays.
However, as evidenced by all the various relay login requests I am constantly inundated with, I believe it is also fetching notes from the inbox and/or outbox relays of those who have replied to a top-level note, and maybe anyone tagged in those notes, too.
That means you WILL see spam if those users have not been on top of maintaining their relay lists.

2026-09-03 00:52:55 UTC

- reply

Yep, that's why. Jank.army is showing that the spam is on relay.primal.net, which I also have blocked on Amethyst.

2026-09-03 00:48:43 UTC

- reply

Interesting. Do you have any relays blocked?

2026-09-03 00:44:24 UTC

- reply

There are quite a few spam replies to this note:
#nevent1q…ahf3
When you view the replies, do you see them?

2026-09-03 00:32:43 UTC

- reply

On your own posts, or on the posts of other users? Do you see the spam replies that @npub176g…q836 mentioned on his post?

2026-09-03 00:31:23 UTC

- reply

Yes, I have mentioned exactly this previously. Amethyst assumes that all relay lists other than inbox/outbox (kind 10002) should be private lists, and therefore encrypted. However, this is the LEAST compatible with other Nostr clients, and users have no way to choose not to have those lists encrypted.
Nevertheless, ALL Nostr clients should expect that lists can contain encrypted content, and support reading that content if they support those lists. This is detailed in NIP-51 (Lists), which says, "Lists can contain references to anything, and these references can be public or private... private items are specified in a JSON array that mimics the structure of the event tags array, but stringified and encrypted using the same scheme from NIP-44 (the shared key is computed using the author's public and private key) and stored in the .content."

2026-09-02 23:14:51 UTC

- reply

Looks like @npub176g…q836 is using Amethyst, so this is not going to be enough to resolve the problem on its own. Because of the way Amethyst has implemented the outbox model, it connects to relays that are not in the user's outbox or inbox relays in order to display replies. In my experience, it does this even though I have proxy relays set.
This being the case, I also encountered a lot of spam while using Amethyst, even though I have ZERO public relays in my inbox relays. The only solution I could really come up with that was effective was to add the relays where the spam was appearing to my blocked relay list.
My list of blocked relays is growing as I encounter spam on new relays, but here's what I have blocked so far:
relay.primal.net
top.testrelay.top
relay.ditto.pub
nostr.bitcoiner.social
nostr.oxtr.dev
relay.dreamith.to
bitcoiner.social
Now, the unfortunate thing is, Amethyst encrypts the entries on the blocked relays list, and many other clients don't read that encrypted content, so they will still connect to those relays. For instance, I am on jank.army right now and I see all the spam, even though it is on relays I have already blocked. This disregard for encrypted entries on lists is far too common.

2026-09-02 04:38:23 UTC

- reply

Looks like it's just a single relay, but a popular public one.

2026-09-01 18:22:10 UTC

- reply

Won't get a chance today, and maybe not for a few days. My seminary term started this week and I am also guest speaking Friday evening and have to prep for that.

2026-08-31 05:36:08 UTC

- reply

Same question re: Amethyst.

2026-08-31 05:31:24 UTC

So, is it just me or is it odd that Wisp/Dark Wisp allows you to add PoW to your notes, but doesn't allow you to filter out notes from users outside your WoT who haven't included PoW?

2026-08-31 05:17:09 UTC

So... When do we get to sell our duplicate coins on the Blake chain?

2026-08-31 05:09:10 UTC

Keep an eye on this as it progresses. It's shaping up to be a powerful way to have P2P access to your digital library of movies and TV shows, and far easier to set up than Jellyfin.
#nevent1q…04p8

2026-08-30 20:52:12 UTC

- reply

Public relays in general are always a haven for spam, and Primal's public relay is one of the most popular, so it is always chalk full of it when these types of spam-attacks happen.

2026-08-30 18:33:41 UTC

- reply

Already did before posting. I thought that might be the issue, too.

2026-08-30 16:38:31 UTC

- reply

Doesn't seem to be working in Dark Wisp. I had the "Spam replies" filter on already and turned the WoT filter on as well, then recomputed my social graph for good measure. Still seeing this:
https://relay.brightbolt.net/9bc961971b33cf7361bb59a6d8bb95d75da02113d07c38195b8d733087f2e896.jpg

2026-08-30 16:21:48 UTC

- reply

Yeah, WoT client-side is definitely another effective tactic.
Outbox model somewhat requires that you connect to other users' inbox relays to fetch replies to their notes, though. Unless, of course, you are making use of an aggregator relay that is pulling those replies for you.
When looking at replies to your own posts, your own inbox relays should be sufficient, but when looking for replies to someone else's note, there is no reason to expect that they will be available on your inbox relays, so outbox clients should be connecting to the OP's inbox relays to fetch those replies, unless you have added them to your blocked relays list.

2026-08-30 15:08:19 UTC

If you have a personal music library and want to be able to easily listen to it remotely, then give PearTune a try.
Just install the host app on the computer with your library (available for Umbrel, too), point it at your Music directory, then scan a QR code with the Pear Tune app on your phone, and you're done. No opening ports, no VPS and reverse proxy, and no need to use Tailscale or similar VPN. Just scan and you are connected P2P to your home computer's media library from anywhere.
#nevent1q…j63n

2026-08-30 15:02:06 UTC

- reply

This is all about relay setup here.

2026-08-29 07:30:29 UTC

- reply

I'd debate you, but I have a feeling we are pretty aligned on this one.
All laws are an instantiation of SOMEONE'S morality. The only true morality is God's. Therefore all laws should be an instantiation of God's moral law.
Christian magistrates will more closely apply God's law to the civil spere than non-Christians, all else being equal.
Nevertheless, we should not expect to achieve an ideal instantiation of God's moral law through any human magistrates, since all have remaining corruption, even in the best cases. Yet, this reality does not relieve us from the duty of pursuing the ideal.
No one should understand any of the above to mean that I would favor the establishment of any particular denomination as the official "Church of the United States," nor that civil authority should be subject to ecclesiastical authority by means of church officers ruling over the civil government, nor that I think the state can or should compel faith in Christ. I do not hold to any of those more extreme views.

2026-08-26 20:26:42 UTC

Race Realism and modern psychology make the very same error: They attribute moral failings to physiological conditions.
The result is also the same: They remove both hope of gospel-transformation and responsibility to repent, since no man can change his biology, and regeneration and sanctification are spiritual works on a man's soul, not on his body.

2026-08-25 21:25:19 UTC

#nevent1q…w87t
Reformed folks should naturally understand this. We already know how to distinguish between God's descriptive and prescriptive wills.
How God has providentially ordered history must never be taken as warrant for establishing morally binding duties without explicit instruction in Scripture.

2026-08-24 21:30:29 UTC

Made a friend today at work:
https://relay.brightbolt.net/dae09668345b4dde986e225237bf7877ba1692808441df06f0149de59c76dd08.jpg

2026-08-24 05:11:19 UTC

If any small collection of entities can delete your voice it was never yours.
#nevent1q…0jpp

2026-08-23 20:38:00 UTC

- reply

Dunson is definitely more readily digestible. Tomes took some work to translate into something I could wrap my mind around, but the substance was worth the effort in my estimation.

2026-08-23 04:12:02 UTC

- reply

Not a bad idea. It's pretty short and sweet by comparison.

2026-08-22 21:23:12 UTC

#Boris is looking really good on a tablet @nprofile…9ccm.
https://relay.brightbolt.net/421363287ff01f4ccc0591daeb8b9838b44a75a62ecf2fcc88c868cbcc64fcc4.jpg

2026-07-04 08:32:47 UTC

- reply

Nerd here. I have a couple different options for always-on NIP-46 signers, between Amber on my phone and Signet or Bunker46 on my Start9. Yet, I wouldn't know where to start with setting up a scheduler DVM.
I do agree that an always-on NIP-46 signer is probably not the solution for most users. Do most users have a need to schedule posts, though?

2025-11-06 08:16:27 UTC

- reply

Yeah, the exact way the apps are signed for the Zapstore is above my head. It's probably just a note with the hash of the app that is signed by the Nostr key. When Zapstore downloads the app to your device, it then checks the hash of what was downloaded against the hash in the note signed by the dev's Nostr key to make sure they match before installing.

2025-11-06 00:51:44 UTC

- reply

Of course their signatures will be different. Play Store doesn't use Nostr private keys for signing, while Zapstore does.
Uninstall the Play Store version and install the Zapstore version.